The years that followed · Inside the stores, hands on the work
That early success put us in rooms we hadn't expected to be in. Over the
years that followed, we were invited out to specific independent hardware
stores to consult, spoke at a few trade shows and annual conventions, and
built relationships with retailers all across the channel. It wasn't
glamorous. Most of it was sitting at a back-office desk next to a store
owner, working through the actual nuts and bolts of getting a site up,
keeping it running, and getting it found.
What we kept running into wasn't a lack of will. It was the technical lift.
To us, the work felt routine — it was what we did every day. To a
store owner already running a counter, a delivery truck, a payroll, and a
paint desk, it was another full-time job nobody had budget for. Every
retailer we worked with hit the same wall: "We'll handle the
website ourselves" turned into months of effort, a site that
couldn't out-rank a national chain, and a quiet retreat.
We saw a version of the same thing on our way out. When we eventually sold
the tool-and-hardware division — a small business, sold locally
— the buyer had real hopes for it, and we did too. But what came
next looked a lot like what we'd been watching in the stores: the online
side of the work proved harder to sustain than anyone expected. It wasn't
a lack of effort. It rarely is. It's the same gap that's swallowed so many
brick-and-mortar businesses trying to step into the online space —
the distance between seeing the opportunity and actually keeping the
whole operation running.
That's the moment it really landed. Asking every independent to
build and run their own site is the wrong solution. Watching
retailers struggle, then watching something we'd built struggle for the
same reasons, made it impossible to ignore: this channel needed a
different approach entirely. The tools and infrastructure that exist
today — the platforms, the integrations, the data
— weren't there yet. If they had been, a lot of those stories
probably end differently. But they didn't exist, so the better answer
had to wait.